ACM

Lawmakers Issue Call for Protections for PEG Access

If our leaders really sincerely care or believe that citizen voices are important, or understood the value of public access as strategic resources to empower citizens and encourage civic participation through participation in an open electronic forum, or really mean it when they say that they are dedicated to support true media democracy, then they would work urgently to ensure Public Access is fully protected. Better still, not just work urgently, we should have it today.

Public Access is an electronic public square, an open forum. When corporations such as Verizon or AT&T or even government does anything to hinder, Public Access, diminish it's funding, or make it challenging for people to access public access resources, public censorship becomes obvious. People are speaking out and working hard to undo deregulation that has allowed corporate giants to restrict public voices, essentially an equivalent to shutting down a public square or forum.

This most recent edition of the NATO Journal publishes a great article written by Barbara Popovic, which updates us on the latest legislative activity concerning PEG channels. The article would make for good reading by our own Massachusetts Senators, as well as local authorities. More here

FCC listening to comments as phone companies work hard to remove your opporunity to benefit from public access

This is related to yesterday's blog
Public Access and PEG channels have been around for over three decades. Watching the way phone company lobbiest influence legislators you might think these people have been living in a dictatorship in a far off place on the globe. They seem to have no idea on the true value and benefits public access can provide to a community.

Time Warner destroying public access in Los Angeles

The writer of the article below ends with "A people without access to their airwaves is one without access to their government. " I am compelled to point out, for the sake of of own city leadership and for others , the point of the quote is not simply that we are able to simply "see" government in the act of doing it's business, but that the people will also have an opportunity to discuss, critique, and offer opinions in an open forum on those very airwaves or cable ways. In other words, to have a government access channel is not enough. Ideally, Public Access television is the venue that allows everyone an opportunity to participate without fear of retribution from government itself. Even dictators allow those they rule over watch what they are doing, if and when they choose. De-regulation of cable and phone industries or the move to state authorized franchises are paving a road full of disasters for democracy, free speech, and citizen participation. In a California loop hole, Time Warner has found a way to close fourteen public access stations in Los Angeles alone. The public outcry against such an act is rarely mentioned, if mentioned at all, in the mainstream media. Wonder why? The media is controlled by a select few and because profits matter more than citizen participation and democracy to those who control air, phone and cable ways. Our government leadership has not stopped this trend that threatens everyone in this country today. Why is it that it seems that cities, everywhere, are failing to understand the importance and value of public access television or that Public Access centers can offer a strategic priority to stimulate and encourage economic, cultural, and civic growth through it's unique mission of inclusiveness in electronic media platform?

The Hoffington Post, Dec 29th, Jayne Stahl writes:

On December 31st, Time Warner Cable plans to pull fourteen public access channels and studios in Los Angeles a city whose name has, for generations, been synonymous with media and broadcasting. This move will act to solidify recent gains in media consolidation, as well as set a dangerous precedent for television programming nationally.

Those of us born on the cusp of the McCarthy era, who are old enough to remember both McCarthys, also recall a time when another administration whose high crimes and misdemeanors would have gone undetected were it not for the free flow of information, and the ability of newspapers to pursue diverse paths in investigative journalism, a prospect which would be nearly impossible today.

Active dissent is greatly diminished in a climate in which independent programming is not enabled to survive. Allowing a cable behemoth, Time Warner, to eliminate more than a dozen public access channels means, in effect, green lighting standardized programming that exists solely to feed the corporate coffer at the expense of creative, community participation.

Bottom line, Mr. Attorney General: there needs to be diversity for the First Amendment to thrive. There needs to be citizen participation in a democracy, and no monopoly can be allowed to defeat that which is intrinsic to individual growth.

The Caucus for TV Producers, Writers, and Directors, Ed Asner, and all of us who are concerned about the life expectancy of an intellectual environment that embraces independence of thought, and diversity, call upon you, as chief law enforcement officer in your state, for injunctive relief, and a temporary restraining order against Time Warner to prevent them from pulling the plug on public access channels in Los Angeles this New Year's Eve.

A people without access to their airwaves is one without access to their government. On this, I know we agree.

****
Many agree with the fact that Public Access is to important to loose.
Share on the Alliance list serve, thanks to Rob McCausland is the following list of Hollywood celebs that agree and join the fight to stop Time Warner for shutting down public access stations in Los Angeles:

What do these Hollywood heavy weights have in common?
By David Hernandez
Save LA Public Access: Los Angeles Public Access Coalition
12/25/08

Rene Balcer, Emmy and Peabody Award winning writer
and producer of landmark television series “Law and Order”; co-creator, writer,
and producer of “Law and Order: Criminal Intent.”

Hinton Battle,
dancer, dramatic actor, singer, choreographer, writer, director, and producer
as well as America’s
only living three-time Tony Award winner.

Warren Beatty, Oscar-winning writer, producer,
director, and actor, winner of the Academy’s 2000 Irving G. Thalberg Memorial
Award.

Stefan Bechtel, non-fiction author.

Steven Bochco, Multiple Emmy, Peabody, and Humanitas
Award-winning writer, producer, and creator of landmark television series,
including “Hill Street Blues,” “L.A. Law,” “Doogie Howser,” and “N.Y.P.D.
Blue.”

Peggy Charren, founder of Action for Children’s
Television, winner of the Peabody Award and the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Vin Di Bona, Chairman of the prestigious Caucus for
Television Producers, Writers, and Directors, winner Emmy and Peabody Awards,
creator and producer of “America’s Funniest Home Videos.”

John Connolly, actor, President of the American
Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA).

Blake Edwards, award-winning director, writer,
producer, one of only three recipients of the prestigious Preston Sturges Award
given jointly by the DGA and WGA, awarded the French Legion of Honor, winner of
the French Cesar.

Diane English, multiple Emmy-winning writer and
producer, creator of “Murphy Brown.”

Jonathan Estrin , Executive V.P., American Film
Institute, Writer/ producer/director of film and television, winner of WGA
awards, nominated for Emmys and Golden Globes.

Tom Fontana, Emmy, Peabody, and Humanitas
Award-winning writer and producer of “Oz,” “Homicide: Life on the Street,” and
“St. Elsewhere.”

Marshall Goldberg, award winning writer, (”Life Goes
On,” “LA Law,”
“The Paper Chase,” “Newhart,” attorney, Chairman of
the Writer’s Guild Industry-Health Fund and Producer - Writers Guild Pension
Plan.

Roger Gimbel , Emmy award-winning independent
producer.

Craig Haffner, President & CEO Greystone
Television , Emmy Award winning Producer.

Leonard Hill, prolific producer and leading member
of the prestigious Caucus for Television Producers, Writers, and Directors.

Gregory Allen Howard, screenwriter, “Ali,” and
“Remember the Titans,”
winner of Christopher Award and NAACP Image Award.
Winner, Howard University’s Paul Robeson Award.

Gerald Isenberg, Professor, USC School of Cinema -
Television, award- winning producer of over one hundred feature and television
films, former President of Hearst Entertainment, former Chairman, The Caucus
for Television Producers, Writers, and Directors.

Martin Kaplan, Associate Dean, USC Annenberg School
For Communication and Director, The Norman Lear Center (as well as a
screenwriter).

Richard Masur, actor, director, former President,
Screen Actors Guild.

Mary McCormack, star of “K Street” on HBO, critically acclaimed
stage, screen, and television actor.

Dorothea G. Petrie, Emmy award winning producer.

Frank Pierson, Oscar-winning writer, director,
President of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (the “Oscars”).

Sarah Pillsbury, Oscar and Emmy winning producer.

Marian Rees, renowned independent producer of “Miss
Rose White,”
“Love is Never Silent,” “Decoration Day,” “A Son’s
Promise,” and other films that have garnered eleven Emmy Awards and thirty-six
Emmy Nominations, two Golden Globe Awards, six Christopher Awards, the
Humanitas Prize, and a Peabody.

David W. Rintels, multiple Emmy and Peabody-winning
writer-producer, “Darrow,” “Sakharov,” “Andersonville,”
“World War II: When Lions Roared.”

Victoria Riskin, Past President of the Writers Guild
of America, west, and award winning writer-producer.

Allen Sabinson, Dean of Drexel University’s Westphal
College of Media Arts and Design, former President of Production at Miramax
Film and senior executive at A&E, TNT, ABC, ICM, NBC and Showtime.

James Sadwith, Emmy-award winning director for
“Sinatra,” writer, producer.

Sissy Spacek, Oscar-winning actress.

Sander Vanocur, a forty-year veteran of print and
broadcast journalism, including work for The New York Times and Washington
Post, NBC and ABC News.

Paul Wagner, Oscar-winning writer-producer-director
of documentary and dramatic independent films.

Their Organization has just announced support of our
efforts to stop Time Warner Cable from closing down the Public Access Studios
in Los Angeles!

Reno and Charter agree to wait on PEG Channel changes

From the Alliance for Community Media List serve:

Reno, Nev.

Charter Agrees to Hold Off on Moving Public, Education and Government Channels

Reno, NV Charter agreed today it would not move Public, Education and Government
(PEG) channels over the next 90 days to allow the City of Reno and Charter
Communications to continue discussing the issues.

The City of Reno has agreed to hold off on filing for a temporary restraining order
against Charter Communications for the next 90 days.

On August 20, 2008 the City Council directed the City Attorneys Office to take legal
action to stop Charter from moving PEG channels from their current locations to
higher channel numbers on the digital tier. The channels were scheduled to move on
August 26, 2008.

No quorum, no meeting, a little progress however.

No quorum, no meeting last night. The meeting may be rescheduled for July 22, 2008 stay tuned for more fun and frolics. I hope you can join us.

There was no meeting but we did converse while waiting for no show members.

One topic of conversation centered around the City Manager's request of his Cable Advisory committee to recommend how he should allocate the capital grant portion of the cable franchise license to the PEG channels ( 11, 12 and WCCA TV 13).

The conversation got a little testy after WCCA asked why the process of deciding what to recommend to is taking so long, when between the school and city accounts there appears to be a remaining balance exceeding $1.8 million dollars of unencumbered un-used cable franchise money ( as of June 2008). We believe that amount may be more than enough to satisfy the capital needs of all three PEG channels plus finance the attorney for the next renewal .The question seemed to be received with much resentment from the city's director of the government channel, who is also the head of the city's cable division, recording secretary for the cable advisory committee and city administration's liaison to the committee , who also seems to have a lot of clout with the group ( we're not sure how that is not a conflict of interest, but we already fought and lost that one ). The meeting quickly ended, but not before the Committee Chair said he would look into the Government and WPS channel account through the city auditor's department. The representatives from the WPS did not seem to know about the over $ 600,000 balance they had, which I found interesting.

Remember though, this wasn't an official meeting, there was no quorum.

For the last couple of months while we attended the one other cable advisory meeting held, we are told that the capital grant has to be split between the three PEG channels, and we were left with the impression that it was unlikely WCCA's would receive the full amount of capital it needs to meet current equipment needs. In addition we were led to understand that the city may take funds, of the top, to pay for an attorney for the next renewal. Last night,the government channel, the school channel, and WCCA TV13, all informed the committee members in attendance of what each respective channel's equipment capital needs were. WCCA needs to have nearly every single piece of equipment replaced with digital technology. All three PEG channels, combined, need about a bit less than about $ 700,000 Capital funds for the next five years. Not really far from the level capital funds received in 1997.

We hope to avoid any injustice in the process. In the recent past, WCCA has contributed surveys, comprehensive assessments, focus group results, a survey produced by Nancy Richard a member of the Alliance for Community Media, which indicated best practices, franchise rev's, PEG staff assignments, throughout the nation , with intention to help the city's cable and telecommunication strategy. We also pointed to the folks who pioneered this industry and set the standard, to the best of public access centers, and municipal franchise best practices, including third party consulting reports and all the rest of it. More importantly hundreds of people wrote, sent letters, editorials, petitioned, or came to public hearings in support of WCCA, but none of it appears to be enough as far as we can tell ( contrary to the purpose of an ascertainment process). We couldn't find much of it included in the Cable Advisory ascertainment report by the way either.

This however, still raises concerns. TV is the most important medium on the face of the earth.For the past 22 years WCCA, it's staff and volunteers, has and continues to be dedicated to serving the people of this city, as we provide a cutting edge technological resource to empower citizens, so everyone can share in the free flow of information at level unmatched on TV or anywhere else. Public Access is and should be one of the center pieces of municipal telecommunication and cable strategic plans.

When I hear stories of how some cities go out of their way to encourage and support their public access centers, to ensure and be inclusive of Public Access, accepting and fighting to secure the added value and vital role Public Access plays in their community, how do you think it makes us feel in the midst of our experience of Worcester's cable franchise process?

Look through this website, anything you need to know about public access can be found here or through various links throughout it's content.This is not reinventing the wheel.

The city council passed a motion asking the city manager to sign a contract with WCCA by the end of June. Perhaps by the next August Council meeting we have more news to share.

Competition equals lower prices? Think again.

link

Cable Franchising Bills No Help To Consumers: Survey
66% Of Respondents Say Cable Rates Are Up Despite Competition
by Linda Haugsted
Multichannel News
07/07/08

State cable franchising bills have not led to lower cable rates, and support for
public access channels has eroded in those states with such schemes, according to a
survey conducted by the Alliance for Community Media and the National Association of
Telecommunications Officers and Advisors.

The survey, which included 140 public access center officials from 18 states where
cable is no longer locally regulated, showed that 66% of the respondents said basic
cable rates have increased in their communities, even after the arrival of
competition.

In testimony in support of many of these bills, supporters asserted that the quick
arrival of competition, enabled by such bills, would lower consumer rates. Only 1%
of survey respondents said rates decreased after the bills were passed.

Competitors have taken advantage of the new regulatory regime: 68% of respondents
said competitors, including AT&T and Verizon, have applied for state franchises.
However, incumbents are taking advantage of the regulatory change, too. Fifty-two
percent of respondents said legacy operators have applied to be regulated by the
state.

The ACM is most interested in the impact to its members, and the rest of the survey
had to do with the current state of financial and other support for local cable
production. Twenty percent of the respondents, from communities in California,
Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas and
Wisconsin said their funding had decreased since the passage of state regulatory
bills.

Twenty-six percent of those polled said they've lost free cable service to
libraries, school and other public buildings; and 41% said they've lost or had a
reduction in benefits for the operation of local institutional networks.

The ACM said it would use the survey information to seek legislative or regulatory
action that will preserve localism provided by PEG channels.

~~~

Rob McCausland
Director of Information & Organizing Services
Alliance for Community Media
202-393-2650

GOOD NEWS: The Senate takes a stand against BIG media

Just moments ago, by a near-unanimous vote, the Senate stood up to Big
Media. They voted to throw out the FCC decision to let the largest
media companies swallow up even more local media.

This is simply an astounding victory, and it would not have happened
without the massive grassroots effort by you and thousands of others who called their senators, sent more than a quarter million letters,
posted thousands of pictures and stories on StopBigMedia.com, and testified at public hearings held by the FCC.

It was your dedication that made today's Senate win possible.

Today was a huge step forward, but there is still much to do. The fight against the FCC now moves to the House, where our elected representatives need to hear from us.

President Bush has promised that he will try to veto this bill. But tonight the Senate and the American people have spoken with one voice.
This historic vote sends a clear message that the only people who support more media consolidation are Big Media lobbyists and the White House.

We are in this struggle to bring more minority ownership, diverse perspectives and independent voices to the media. We need to make media consolidation an election-year issue. And we need to start talking about how to break up the giant conglomerates.

Corporate news today -- with its propaganda pundits, horse-race election coverage, and celebrity gossip -- undermines our democracy. We must continue to speak out and demand that the public airwaves be used to actually serve the public.

In just three weeks, thousands of people will be gathering together in Minnesota to build the movement for better media. You can join them at the National Conference for Media Reform, just visit www.freepress.net/conference.
FreePress

For today, know that you played a key role in the fight for better
media for all.

Thank you,

Josh Silver
Executive Director
Free Press Action Fund

We point to the archive where you may view a C-Span 2 covergage SUBCOMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE INTERNET hearing

Thanks to the Rob McCausland of the ACM for forwarding this to us.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE INTERNET HEARING ENTITLED, "PUBLIC EDUCATION, AND GOVERNMENTAL (PEG) SERVICES IN THE DIGITAL TV AGE"

link

Note: Congressmen/women discuss how PEG access is now providing important local coverage that NO ONE else is providing.

C-SPAN COPYRIGHT POLICY

C-SPAN holds the exclusive copyright in the video of all the public affairs programming it produces.

Although C-SPAN is the only news media organization that regularly televises the legislative proceedings of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate, it does not hold a copyright in that video coverage. That government-produced video is in the public domain which means that it belongs to the American people and may be used without restrictions of any kind.

As part of its mission to make the activities of the federal government more broadly available, C-SPAN has established a copyright policy that allows the public to use C-SPAN's video coverage of federal government events for their own purposes. Those who want to use C-SPAN copyrighted video will be able to do so without concern about further copyright restrictions as long as they adhere to the following policy:

# C-SPAN permits non-commercial use of its video coverage of federal government-sponsored events so long as C-SPAN is identified during the use as the source of the video.

# Keeping a "C-SPAN" logo on the screen during the use is sufficient to identify C-SPAN as the source.

# This generally unrestrictive policy regarding non-commercial use does not apply to (i) original programs created by C-SPAN, (ii) video coverage of privately sponsored events, and (iii) video coverage of other events not sponsored by the federal government.

# C-SPAN does not permit unlicensed commercial use of any of its video programming regardless of whether the use cites C-SPAN as the source of the video. Commercial uses of C-SPAN video may be permitted under an individually negotiated license for which a license fee may be due. [See Licensing and Permissions Requests]

# Nothing in this copyright policy is intended to affect any person's right to make a "fair use" of C-SPAN video programming.

Time Warner trial ends flat-rate Internet fees. Imagine being on the Internet with a meter running.

To me, the following article is a warning that the city of Worcester should be paying attention and solidify a franchise before things shift against municipal and the PEG channel use of broadband. I have read that already Charter and Comcast have suggested they will follow suit. Net Neutrality must exist in order for PEG to remain on the Internet.
If we loose this, depending upon the use of the Internet to reach out and connect could be more costly than ever.

I am sharing this, with thanks, as it appears to be posted by Kim Peterson (Moneyblog Topstocks) and later presented on the ACM's list serve by Ron Beacom.
Time Warner trial ends flat-rate Internet fees

MD

Verizon continues to raise its rates

Cable Competition? Note to city: Be careful what you wish for.

Mike from MNN writes: According to our math, Verizon jacked their cable TV rates 7.5% last year and they now project another 11.5 rate increase this year.
Apparently "Competition = Higher Prices". Hopefully the FCC and those folks in Congress will take note . . .

Read more here
also this By Mike Robuck CedMagazine.com .

Do you think, that it when comes to comparing cable and phone companies, they really are, pretty much, all the same? Rates continue to go up and up. So much for competition. It seems that rate controls, and franchise mandates and regulations are the only way to go. Tell congress to protect local franchises and especially provisions to support Public access.

Syndicate content